Traditional Religions - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 1 Words: 301 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2019/10/10 Did you like this example? The majority of traditional religions include beliefs in a Supreme Being, spirits, divinities, magic and traditional medicine. They believe that the purpose of humanity is to harmonize nature with the supernatural. The problem with the world today according to traditional religions is that people have forgotten about the importance of the spiritual realm. Human beings today focus more on the physical and material world. Traditional concepts of destiny and reality are rooted in the spirit world. The actions and activities of the spiritual beings governs all spiritual and social phenomena. Unexplainable day-to-day events proved to traditional people the existence of a world aside from the visible one. Traditional religions believe that the spirits are intermediaries between God and humans. There are good and bad spirits. Misfortune and suffering are believed to be caused by inappropriate behavior from communities, individuals, and intervention of bad spirits. The world is current unbalanced; the spirit word has been neglected despite its dominance over the material world. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Traditional Religions" essay for you Create order In order for world to regain balance, the people need to regain favor from the good spirts and establish a close relationship with the spirit world. Good spirits provide protection against disease, misfortune, harm, heal illness, and provide children, wild game, and rain for crops, fish, and protection for livestock. Manifestation of these blessings are dependent on the right behavior on the part of the people. Good behavior includes practicing and following behavior and values established by culture and society, participation in religious practices and rituals, and respect for neighbors, family, and the community. Rituals are religious or cultural ceremonies that celebrate events that have religious significance. Failure to abide by these guidelines results in the good spirits stopping their protection and blessing. This is what has resulted in the vast misfortunes, droughts, deaths, and illnesses we see today.

The Character of Antigone Essay - 522 Words

The Character of Antigone Antigone, the character for which the play was named, is a very complex character. She seems to change directions all throughout the play and there is never one point in which you know exactly what she will do because she is just that unpredictable. This unpredictability also makes her seem very hypocritical because she will say something and then turn on a dime and say the complete opposite. Antigone’s character is very intriguing strictly due to the fact that she keeps you guessing. The following will show the many variations that her character shows throughout the play. There are several points in the play that Antigone seems very heroic, especially when she is speaking to Creon about her†¦show more content†¦All of these heroics, however, in a very short time make her look very selfish. After Creon tells her the story about her brother’s bodies, she takes the stance that she must bury her brother for herself. That all but erases the thought of her, as a hero because all of her actions that were thought to have been done for Polynices were only done to satisfy her own needs. The one characteristic of Antigone that seems to be constant throughout the play is her stubbornness. From the beginning of the play when she sneaks out to bury her brother after Creon had specifically told her not to, all the way to the end when she is given the opportunity to marry Haemon and go on living but forces her own death. She always seemed to fight everything for as long as possible, never taking the easy way out if it compromised her beliefs. In the end it was her stubbornness that ultimately killed her. Antigone also attempts to come across as the so-called ‘innocent victim’. When she is first found out and Creon confronts her, she pushes the fact that she had to do it for Polynices. Even when that reason went to hell and she changed her story to say that she had to bury him for herself, she still said she was bound to do it, which represents Antigone trying to make herself look innocent by saying she had to do it. I do not think there is a right or wrong answer as to whether she was an innocent victim or not, but the question is posed all throughout the play. OfShow MoreRelatedAntigone Character Analysis1422 Words   |  6 Pages Antigone, the final play in a series including Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, discusses the ideas of leadership, family, and choices. It features two central characters: Antigone, a girl who chooses to illegally bury her brother, and Creon, a king who decrees the burial of the brother to be illegal. Upon the first encounter of the text, it appears that Antigone is the â€Å"hero† of the play, but on further analysis, one realizes that the tragic hero, as defined by Aristotle, is actually Creon. The ideaRead MoreAntigone Character Analysis1071 Words   |  5 PagesSophocles’s Antigone depicts the struggle between two different characters with their own struggles, doubts, and beliefs. The play opens with the eponymous character lamenting a terrible situation to her sister Ismene. Their brothers Eteocles and Polyneices fought over the throne and killed each other in battle. Creon, their uncle, has forbade anyone to bury Polyneices, since he is considered a traitor to the city of Thebes. As the king, Creon holds the authority of the state above family ties, refusingRead MoreAntigone Character Analysis1122 Words   |  5 PagesAntigone is a Greek play that features a heroine that shows courage and righteousness. This is an interesting play that I believe I would enjoy having the ability to direct. The possibilities that this play can become I think would be very entertaining and meaningful to explore. If I were to direct this play I would want it to communicate that courage comes in many forms and that following one’s beliefs and morals against oppressors is one of the most courageous things that one can do. I would alsoRead MoreCharacter Motivations in Antigone745 Words   |  3 PagesThe main characters in Sophocles’ drama, Antigone, are Antigone herself, the play’s tragic heroine and Antigone’s uncle and King of Thebes, Creon. Both characters are ruled by powerful motivations and beliefs; however, they differ from one character to the next. Antigone’s motivation is love for her family- she puts it above all else. In fact, she is willing to sacrifice her life to defend that love. Antigone goes to great lengths to bury her deceased brother, who according to an edict issued byRead MoreThe Characters of Antigone and Creon in Antigone by Sophocles1130 Words   |  5 PagesThe Characters of Antigone and Creon in Antigone by Sophocles Antigone is story of divine retribution and human imperfectness. In this tragedy a powerful king, Creon is brought down by the Gods because of his contempt against their divine laws and true justice is shown to triumph at the end. Creon makes the mistake of putting his personal views over and above the divine laws and fails in the eyes of the Gods. He makes the mistake of testing the Gods power and the Read MoreCharacter Analysis Of Antigone1533 Words   |  7 Pagesplay centers around a young girl, Antigone, that is determined to bury her wronged brother even though it will end in her imminent death. Creon, the king, has deemed it illegal for anyone to bury Antigone’s brother’s body, even though it is the female family member s duty given by the gods to perform the burial. Antigone stuck to her oath to bury her brother and is caught by Creon and sentenced to death. One of the main themes in this play is family. Each character s ending will be tragic due toRead MoreAntigone Character Analysis916 Words   |  4 PagesSophocles’ play Antigone, my initial impression of Creon was that his beliefs of the law and the state were rational because of his role as a ruler. But as the play progressed, I began to disagree with his behavior and his values because he only focused on his own moral beliefs rather than considering the beliefs of other people, which could hav e resolved conflict. Throughout the play, the theme of authority of the state and religion is represented through the individual beliefs of Antigone and Creon.Read MoreAntigone Character Analysis927 Words   |  4 PagesThis theme comes to life in Sophocles’ Antigone, as he illustrates the internal and external struggles of complex characters. The play follows Antigone, a young rebellious girl betrothed to the king’s son. Haemon, prince of Thebes, finds his loyalty caught between his father’s legalistic ways and Antigone’s,   which stem from emotion. In Antigone, Haemon reveals himself as a tragic hero through his struggle between obedience to his father and his love for Antigone. His struggle reveals how obedienceRead MoreCharacter Analysis Of Antigone1009 Words   |  5 PagesIn Sophocles’ Antigone, Antigone finds herself between King Creon and her deep belief in the Gods. Antigone holds a high social status as she is one of the daughters of the late King Oedipus and she is King Creon’s niece. The play starts off with Antigone losing both her brothers in a battle that took place around the city of Thebes. One brother, Eteocles, is defending the city while the other brother, Polynices, is attacking. King Creon declares a decree that no one is to bury the traitor and ifRead MoreThe Tragic Characters Of Sophocles Antigone1652 Words   |  7 Pagesdrama where the main character in the end suffers extreme sorrow because of their mistakes or poor judgment. If characters’ fates are to suffer the extreme sorrows, then these characters are tragic characters. These tragic characters, however, must follow Aristotle’s principles which include hamartia, hubris, peripeteia, anagnorisis, nemesis, and catharsis. If the character has all six of Aristotle’s principles, then the character can qualify as an Aristotelian tragic character. Two examples of Aristotelian

Understanding Work-Related Injuries Free Essays

Understanding Work Related Injuries HCR230 Understanding Work Related Injuries Claims Process When an injury occurs on the job, it must be reported verbally and in writing to the employer within a certain time period. Once notified the employer must notify the state workers’ compensation office and insurance carrier, within a certain time period. In some cases the employee is given a medical service order to take to the physician for treatment (Valerius, Bayes, Newby, Seggern, 2008). We will write a custom essay sample on Understanding Work-Related Injuries or any similar topic only for you Order Now Responsibility of Physician of Record Responsibility of the treating physician or physician of record is to treat the injured or ill employee. This physician treats the patient’s condition and evaluates the percentage of disability and the return-to-work date. The physician of record files a progress report with the insurance carrier each time there is a substantial change in the patient’s condition that affects their disability status or when the state requires (Valerius, Bayes, Newby, Seggern, 2008). Responsibility of Employer and Insurance Carrier Providers submit their charges to the workers’ compensation insurance carrier and are paid directly by the carrier. Charges are limited to an established fee schedule. Patients cannot be billed for any medical expenses. The employer may not be billed for any amount that exceeds the established fee (Valerius, Bayes, Newby, Seggern, 2008). The employer or physician of record is responsible for the First Report of Injury form within a certain time period. The amount of time varies with each state, but ranges from twenty-four hours to ten days. The form contains information about the patient, the employer, the injury or illness. This report can be filed electronically or mailed (Valerius, Bayes, Newby, Seggern, 2008). According to the website (Idaho State Insurance Fund, 2012) when an injury occurs in the State of Idaho, the employer should immediately provide prompt medical attention, transport the injured worker to medical facility, show concern for the injured worker, conduct an investigation, document all details, obtain written statements from injured worker and witness, notify State Insurance Fund immediately if the injury is severe, and complete the First Report of Injury. In Idaho the claims examiner is the primary contact for coordinating all actions relating to medical treatment and finalizing of the claim (Idaho State Insurance Fund, 2012). Responsibility of Employee in the State of Idaho According to the website (Idaho State Insurance Fund, 2012) in the State of Idaho, the injured worker can make the claims process run along promptly by notifying their supervisor immediately, help fill out the First Report of Injury or Illness form completely, make sure their name appears exactly like it does on the company payroll, seek medical attention immediately and ask that all documents are sent to the State Insurance Fund, have their claim number when making any phone calls or returning all documents, attend all scheduled medical appointments, avoid activities that would slow or stop recovery process, cooperate with the Industrial Commission Rehabilitation Division, keep their employer informed of your progress and when they are able to return to work, and inform the State Insurance Fund about changes in their employment status while their claim is open. The insurance carrier assigns a claim number to the case, determines if the claim is eligible for workers’ compensat ion and notifies the employer. This determination is either an Admission of Liability stating the employer is responsible or a Notice of Contest which is a denial of employer liability. The worker must be notified of the determination within the allowed time (Valerius, Bayes, Newby, Seggern, 2008). If the employee is eligible for compensation for lost wages, checks are sent directly to the employee with no taxes deducted. If the claim is denied the employee must pay back all the medical bills associated with the accident. These charges may be submitted to the individuals’ own health insurance carrier for payment (Valerius, Bayes, Newby, Seggern, 2008). Appeals Employees may appeal workers’ compensation decisions. The first step to appeal is to request mediation. A mediator is an impartial individual who works with both parties to obtain a satisfactory outcome. If mediation fails for the employee, there can be a formal legal hearing requested and a judge will hear both sides of the claim and make a decision. If the decision is still not satisfactory then the employee may appeal to a higher court, such as a workers’ compensation appeals board or a state supreme court (Valerius, Bayes, Newby, Seggern, 2008). Workers’ Compensation and the HIPAA Privacy Rule A workers’ compensation case is one of the few situations where a physician can disclose a patient’s health information (PHI) to an employer without the patient’s releasing authorization. Workers’ compensation cases are not subject to the same confidentiality rules as medical records. Some states and federal law allow claims adjusters and employers unrestricted access to workers’ compensation files. A patient does not have the right under the Privacy Rule to request a physician restrict or not disclose their PHI for workers’ compensation purposes when that disclosure is require by law. But the physician does not have the right to disclose any previous condition of the patient that is not directly related to the claim of an employer or insurer, that would require written authorization of the patient (Valerius, Bayes, Newby, Seggern, 2008). References Idaho State Insurance Fund. (2012). Retrieved from http://www. idahosif. org, November 3, 2012. Valerius, J. , Bayes, N. , Newby, C. , Seggern, J. (2008). Medical Insurance: An integrated claims process approach (3rd ed. ). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. How to cite Understanding Work-Related Injuries, Essay examples

Corporate Philanthropy Business Charity Purpose

Question: Describe about the Corporate Philanthropy for Business Charity Purpose. Answer: Introduction Fruitful philanthropy nowadays is not about issuing checks for charity purposes; it is continuously becoming a method used by most institutions to communicate with investors, measure their interests, and fulfill their expectations. Corporate philanthropy refers to the generous donations of proceeds given by corporations to non-profit organizations. Corporate philanthropy is continuously evolving, yet the evolution of this exercise has remained constant for more than a decade, and still the concerns of the society regarding corporate involvement on social issues are related to those dated as far back as the 1800s (Edwards, 2015). In the dawn of the 19th and early 20th century, the courts in the US maintained verdicts against company giving cash away. With time, however, this activity gained reception and was legitimized through the law court. The most common corporate philanthropy known to many may be the direct funding of charity events. However, the modern corporate philanthropy landscape has evolved and includes a wide variation of types of giving,' not only cash contributions but also other means of product donations, knowledge and employee volunteering. While some may argue that philanthropy may cost the business, it may also provide some benefits to the organization, employees and the community. Understanding the meaning of corporate philanthropy may help the company substantiate the expenditures to the investors and upper administration. Much of the writings on morals and corporate philanthropy campaign for corporate donating by refuting arguments that the exercise is unethical (Ehrlich, 2013). The nuclear dispute regarding corporate giving is that profit is put back into the business or go to the shareholders. Business is obliged to be economically viable. Early philanthropy by corporates was the owners giving away their money, not those of the company. Nevertheless, donations by corporate started growing in the late 1800s; companies started funding learning institutions and local services like hospitals and churches. Development in the dawn of the 19th century led to societal hitches, and economic challenges were providing a setting for corporate involvement, Courts during this time began to rule favoring companies that were donating to areas that would, directly and indirectly, profit the business and its workers. Critics in the early years of corporate donation highlighted that rather than compassionate behavior, companies aimed at fixing problems they had caused (Edwards, 2015). That is, the economic challenges and social issues that the corporations brought. Similar accusations befall organizations involved in donations today. Suspect reasons including an attempt to cover unethical financial connections, environmental issues, and other manipulative business practices. Many scholars have explored corporates inspiration and consumer insights towards corporate philanthropy. The problem is also common in trade publications and the press. It seems to be a regular topic in the journals such as the Journal of Business Ethics. The arguments mostly are that corporations should act responsibly, and shareholders and the community should hold them answerable for their activities from their daily business to their philanthropic endeavors (Haynes, et al., 2012). However, the question begs what measure of accountability is to be employed. Normally, the pyramid of corporates societal duty is the foundation by which investigators measure companys activities. The most important functions of a business are maintaining economic viability, obeying the laws that regulate the business and being aware of principled practices outside legal devotion, to act conferring to the peoples expectations (Harvey Brest, 2013). For example, being fair to employees, being environmentally sensitive and competing fairly. The managers of today must be able to balance a mixed drive model bringing together all the three into a tactical pattern satisfactory to the public (Harvey Brest, 2013). Corporate philanthropy is on the decline nowadays; the reasons are not difficult to understand. Directors see themselves in a no-win situation; they find themselves in the middle between critics who are challenging multiple levels of philanthropy and the stakeholders persistently pressuring the managers for short duration profits. Giving extra does not satisfy critics, the more corporates donate, the more community anticipates from them. Executive hence find it difficult to justify open-handed expenses regarding bottom line benefits (Brooks Dunn, 2012). This predicament has led to companies being tactical in their philanthropy (Harvey Brest, 2013), though being philanthropic does not guarantee success for the business, nowadays it is not strategic. Increasingly, corporate philanthropy is a form of public relations and marketing purposes, meant to endorse the corporate brand and image through cause-related promotion or other high profile funding. While these activities deliver much-needed aid to worthy causes, they anticipate to escalate company reflectivity and increase employee drive so as to create societal impact (Shaw et al., 2013). Companies with successful strategic philanthropic efforts follow four plans, they set quantifiable goals, define their involvement, set established principles that guide in decision-making and communicate their activities to the stakeholders. For instance, instead of a company just marketing their participation in societal issues, they also report their charitable efforts as part of CSR report unified into the enterprises activities, while pursuing two-way communication with the investors, engaging them in corporate outreach programs (Harvey Brest, 2013). This stress on the business leadership involvement in driving corporate philanthropy decision-making rather than a department is an indicator that some business stakeholders embrace the awareness of corporate citizenship as an all-inclusive entity. Research suggests that corporate citizen has grown and is projected to integrate its responsible communal behavior, service its economic importance and the interest of the society in whi ch it functions. The way corporate philanthropy is in practice today proves that many businesses engaging in this activity are unfocused and diffuse. Many comprise of small cash contributions to aid local civic programs or to provide general support to learning institutions and national charities, all in the expectation of generating goodwill. Rather than being aligned with clear business objectives (Velasquez, 2012), these funds mirror the personal beliefs and values of executives and workforces. It seems that a majority of charity choices made by corporations would be better made by people giving their money. Cisco is one of the companies using context focused philanthropy to attain both societal and economic gain. Through the Cisco Networking Academy, they have come up with an ambitious educational program in which they train computer network administrators, hence easing a possible limit on its growth while providing jobs to high school alumni (Ehrlich, 2013). By concentrating on social issues affecting its business setting, and by making use of its particular qualities, Cisco demonstrates the unrealized hidden potential of corporate philanthropy. Taking this course, however, necessitates major deviations in the way corporations style their contribution agendas. There are numerous channels of corporate philanthropy; the most prominent are the matching gift programs and the volunteer grants. Matching Gift Programs Commonly referred to as free cash for non-profits. These are generous giving plans set up by companies in which the business matches givings made by workers to eligible non-profit institutions. The categories of events depend on what the corporation's policies are. Matching gift plan is considered to be corporate philanthropy because the monetary contribution to nonprofit institutions is projected to help assist a mission that once solved, would better civilization (Haynes, et al., 2012). Volunteer Grant Programs These differ in that the corporations involved do not contribute cash directly to a nonprofit entity, but they encourage volunteering of their workforce in populations where they reside and work. In this way, corporations provide donations to organizations where workers volunteer on a regular basis (Grace Cohen, 2013). They achieve it in two ways; a firm donates cash per hour to an organization where employees volunteers and secondly, a corporation sets the threshold that once a member volunteers for a particular period, the company is to provide its donation to that non-profit. Volunteer donations like matching gifts is a corporate philanthropy (Edwards, 2015). An example of a company that has taken corporate philanthropy to another level is the Apple Corporation. Apple matches gifts up to $10,000 in a year made by full-time employees, and the company has 80,000 workers. Through its charity programs, Apple has contributed more than $78 million through the matching gift plan. Apple volunteer grant ensures that for an hour that its employee volunteers; the firm donates $25 to that nonprofit organization (Velasquez, 2012). Corporations are encouraged to participate in complete community responsibility, to go beyond customary philanthropy to participatory partnerships that shape commercial and social capital for viable business (Ferrell et al., 2015). Economically viable corporations identify those values and concentrate resources on building and supporting the institution's viability via a common market and capability alignment approach to financial giving (Shaw et al., 2013). The range of activities for these firms include traditional philanthropy, but the emphasis is on events that take the lead of corporate expertise, build on brands or expand corporate values. In the years ensuing pivotal corporate moral breaches, corporations rally to institute core values and social practices, communicating their role in the society in a manner equivalent to those used by personalities. The development of the corporate character through court rulings and accepted commitment in social matters point to the culture allowing the business voice to be part of the societys resolution making. Thus, until changes in legal and satisfactory practices ensue giving corporations less authority, accepting the present status of the corporate being is vital for its participation in the society. References Boatright, JR 2012, Ethics and the conduct of business, 7th ed, Pearson Education, New York. Brede son, D 2012, applied business ethics, Cengage Learning, Mason, OH. Brooks, LJ Dunn, P 2012, Business and professional ethics for directors, executives an accountant, 6th ed, Cengage Learning, Mason, OH. Collins, D 2012, Business ethics: how to design and manage ethical organizations, John Wiley Sons, Hoboken, NJ. Edwards, H., 2015. social responsibility and the evolution of corporate philanthropy. An analysis of successful corporate-cause partnership, pp. 1-10. Ehrlich, E., 2013. Defining corporate Philanthropy. [Online] Available at: https://doublethedonation.com/blog/2013/09/defining-corporate-philanrthropy/ [Accessed 19 September 2016]. Frost, S., 2016. The Importance of Corporate Philanthropy. [Online] Available at: smallbusiness.chron.com/importance-sorporate-philanthropy-33810.html [Accessed 18 September 2016]. Harvey, H. Brest, P., 2013. Money Well Spent: a strategic plan for smart philanthropy. Hoboken New Jersey: Bloomberg Press. Haynes, K., Dillard, J. Murray, A., 2012. Corporate Social Responsibility. s.l.:Routledge. Shaw, WH, Barry, V, Isa, T Carley, B 2013, Moral issues in business, 2nd Asia-Pacific ed, Cengage Learning, Australia. Velasquez, MG 2012, Business ethics: concepts and cases, 7th ed, Pearson Education, New York.