Tuesday, November 12, 2019
Stuart Hall’s Cultural Identity and Diaspora
Ouahani Nasr-edine A Paper about Stuart Hallââ¬â¢s article: Cultural Identity and Diaspora Stuart hall talks about the crucial role of the ââ¬Å"Third Cinemasâ⬠in promoting the Afro-Caribbean cultural identities, the Diaspora hybridity and difference. Hall argues that the role of the ââ¬Å"Third Cinemasâ⬠is not simply to reflect what is already there; rather, their crucial role is to produce representations which constantly constitute the third worldââ¬â¢s peoples as new subjects against their representations in the Western dominant regimes. Their vocation is to allow us to see and recognize the different parts and histories of ourselves. They should provide us with new positions from which to speak about ourselves. Stuart Hall provides an analysis of cultural identities and what they stand for, their workings and underlying complexities and practices. Hall argues that cultural identities are never fixed or complete in any sense. They are not accomplished, already-there entities which are represented or projected through the new cultural practices. Rather, they are productions which cannot exist outside the work of representation. They are problematic, highly contested sites and processes. Identities are social and cultural formations and constructions essentially subject to the differences of time and place. Then, when we speak of anything, as subjects, we are essentially positioned in time and space and more importantly in a certain culture. These subject positions are what Hall calls ââ¬Å"the positions of enunciationâ⬠(222). Hall talks about cultural identity from two different, but related, perspectives. First, he discusses cultural identity as a unifying element or as the shared cultural practices that hold a certain group of people together and second, he argues that as well as there are similarities, there are also differences within cultural identities. In the following paragraphs, we will discuss these two sides of cultural identities. In the first sense, cultural identity is held to be the historical cultural practices that held to be common among a group of people; it is what differentiates them from other groups and held them as of one origin, one common destiny. In this sense, cultural identity refers to those cultural codes which are held to be unchangeable, fixed true practices. This underlying ââ¬Å"onenessâ⬠or ââ¬Å"one true selfâ⬠is the essence, Hall argues, of ââ¬Å"Carribeanessâ⬠, of the black Diaspora. It is this identity which should be discovered by the black Diaspora and subsequently, should be excavated and projected through the representations of the ââ¬Å"Third Cinemasâ⬠. Here we would add that this collective identity is not only to be represented by the ââ¬Å"Third Cinemasâ⬠but also by The Third Literature and through The Third Academia. It is this sense of cultural identity which plays a critical role in eliciting a lot of postcolonial struggles. The act of discovering such identity is at the same time an act of re-shaping and rehabilitating, of re-claiming ââ¬Å"the true selfâ⬠. It is an act which goes beyond ââ¬Å"the misery of todayâ⬠to recover and reconstruct what colonization have distorted. Imaginative rediscovery plays a crucial role in restoring such identity. The emergence of counter discourses (like feminist discourse, anti-racist discourse, anti-colonial discourse and so on) which tries to highlight and bring to the forth the ââ¬Å"hidden historiesâ⬠are an outcome of the creative force of such sense of cultural identity. Hall gives the example of Armet Francis photographs about the peoples from the ââ¬Å"Black Triangleâ⬠which is considered as a visual attempt, an act of imaginary reunification of blacks which have been dispersed and fragmented across the African Diaspora. Another universal unifying element of blacks is the Jazz music. It is an attempt to restore the black agent to his home ââ¬Å"Africaâ⬠, to relocate him, symbolically, within his true essence: ââ¬Å"Africannessâ⬠. Such counter discourses are resources of resistance which problematizes the Western regimes of scholarly and cinematic representations of blacks. The second side of cultural identity is related to the discontinuities and differences, to the historical ruptures within cultural identities. Cultural identity is not just a matter of the past, a past which have to be restored, but it is also a matter of the future. It is a ââ¬Å"matter of ââ¬Ëbecomingââ¬â¢ as well as of ââ¬Ëbeingââ¬â¢Ã¢â¬ (225). In this sense cultural identities no longer signify an accomplished set of practices which is already there; they are subject to the ââ¬Å"playâ⬠of history, power and culture. They are in constant transformation. Hall argues that it is this second sense of cultural identities which enable as to come to terms with ââ¬Å"the traumatic character of the ââ¬Ëcolonial experienceââ¬â¢. The Western representations of the black experiences and peoples are representations of the ââ¬Ëplayââ¬â¢ of power and knowledge. Western categories of knowledge not only position us as ââ¬ËOtherââ¬â¢ to the West but also makes as ââ¬Å"experience ourselves as Othersâ⬠(225). This colonial experience puts as in a dangerous position: it makes us ambivalent in our life, our needs, and our thought. This colonial experience had produced uprooted subjects, split between two words in an unidentified space. This rootlessness, this lack of cultural identity which the colonial experience produces leads us to question the nature of cultural identity itself. In this sense it is never a fixed, shared entity. It is not one and for allâ⬠(226). It is not something which happens in the past but it is a process. What we told ourselves about our past is always constructed through ââ¬Å"memory, fantasy, narrative and mythâ⬠. Cultural identities are not essences but are ââ¬Ëpositioningsââ¬â¢; they are constructed sites from which we speak about ourselves. Hall states that black Caribbean identities are shaped through two operative vectors: the vector of the continuity which is related to the past heritage and the vector the discontinuity which is the result of slavery, transportation and migration. In this sense, it is the Western world that unifies the blacks as much as it cuts them, at the same time, from direct access to their past. This colonial effect on the Caribbean positions the different regions of the Caribbean archipelago as both the same and different simultaneously. In relation to the West, we are positioned in the periphery, one space, one fate and one destiny; but in relation to each other, we have different cultural identities. These variations within cultural identities cannot be simply cinematically presented in simple binary oppositions as ââ¬Å"past/presentâ⬠or ââ¬Å"them/usâ⬠. Drawing on the concept of ââ¬Å"differanceâ⬠which the French philosopher Jacque Derrida had developed, Hall explains that cultural identities which, generally, we think of as eternal and unified are instead, merely a temporary stabilization and arbitrary closure of meaning historically and culturally specific. Cultural identities are subject to the infinite nature of the semiosis of meanings and the endless supplementarity within those meanings. The complexities of the Caribbean cultural identities can be partly understood if we relate it to the three ââ¬Ëpresencesââ¬â¢ over the islands: ââ¬Å"the presence Africaineâ⬠, ââ¬Å"the presence Europeenneâ⬠and the ââ¬Å"presence Americainâ⬠, the terra incognita. The presence Africaine is the space of the repressed. It is inscribed in every aspect of the Caribbean everyday life and it is the secret, hidden code by which Western texts are re-read. This is the live Africa from which ââ¬Å"the Third Cinemasâ⬠and other representations should derive their materials. The discontinuity and ruptures which are caused by slavery and transformation makes us aware of our ââ¬Å"blacknessâ⬠. It causes as to return back to our past to discover our real essence which unites us despite our differences. This process returning back enables the emergence of a ââ¬Ënew Africaââ¬â¢ grounded on and necessarily connected to the symbolic ââ¬Ëold Africaââ¬â¢. Our journey to the old Africa is an imaginative journey, a symbolic journey to the far past to make something of the present day Africa. The presence Europeenne, on the other hand, has positioned us in the rims of the centre and inscribes in us a sense of ambivalence manifested in our attitudes of and identification with the West, going backward and forward from moments of refusal to moments of recognition. Finally, the Americain or the ââ¬Å"New World presenceâ⬠constitutes the battleground where different cultures from different parts of the world grapples and collide with each other, what Mary Louse Pratt calls a ââ¬Å"contact zoneâ⬠. It is the ââ¬Ëemptyââ¬â¢ space, the third space or the space of no one. It is the place where the processes of creolizations, transformations, assimilations, syncretisms and displacements occur: It stands for the endless ways in which Caribbean people have been destined to ââ¬Ëmigrate'; it is the signifier of migration itself- of travelling, voyaging and return as fate, as destiny; of the Antillean as the prototype of the modern or postmodern New World nomad, continually moving between centre and periphery. 234) In this sense, the ââ¬Å"New World presenceâ⬠, the terra incognita, constitutes the very beginning of the Diaspora of the black presence, of diversity, hybridity, and difference. It is an open symbolic space which is constantly producing and re-producing, a space of heterogeneity of constant newness and uniqueness. The rich past of sameness and difference, of shared spiritual and cultural habits on the one hand and of memories of ruptures and discontinuities_ slavery, migration, transformationâ⬠¦_ on the other hand constitute ââ¬Å"the reservoir of our cinematic [and other] narrativesâ⬠. It is the real black Diaspora. Reference:Rutherford, Jonathan. Identity, Community, Culture and Difference. Ed. London: Lawrence & Wishart Limited, 1990.[ 1 ].All the quotations stated in this work are taken from Stuart Hallââ¬â¢s article ââ¬ËCultural Identity and Diasporaââ¬â¢ in Jonathan, Rutherford. Identity, Community, Culture and Difference. Ed. London: Lawrence & Wishart Limited, 1990. PP 222ââ¬â237
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.